English 608 Klimasmith
Introduction to Critical and Research Methods
Critical Exercises 1 and 2
These exercises are linked, so it may make sense for you to
do them at the same time, or at least to be thinking about the journal you’ll
choose for CE2 while you are working on CE1.
Exercise One:
1)
Using the UMB
English Department’s website’s faculty page (http://www.umb.edu/academics/cla/english/faculty)
make a list of the specialties (areas of
expertise within English Studies) in which our faculty work, and list each
faculty member’s name in every appropriate category. Which of these fall under the national
boundaries of British or American literature?
What other categories seem significant?
2)
What are the
period boundaries in chronological order for British literature and American
literature? Using the British/American list from answer #1, put these periods
in chronological order. When do the
British and American fields connect or overlap?
Use any resources you like--one very helpful volume is James Harner’s Literary Research Guide (On reserve at
Healey and in my faculty mailbox for use in the Commons or Grad Lounge ONLY. If you are using my copy, please sign
it out on the sheet in my box and cross your name off when you return it.)
3)
Using your specialties
list from #1, list major journals in each specialty that you see as falling
under “English Studies.” Again, use whatever resources you choose.
4)
Back to the
specialties list. What kinds of
interdisciplinary fields intersect with literary studies? What interdisciplinary journals might be
likely to publish work that relies in part on English studies?
5)
Choose three
journals you’d consider using for CE2. I’d
prefer that there not be a lot of duplication, so I may ask you to choose one
or another of your favorites.
6)
Write a short
(1-2 paragraph) reflection on the field(s) that you find most interesting,
compelling, or useful to you as you begin your graduate studies. What draws you
to this field? What do you hope to learn through your focus?
Please email your response
to me by midnight on Tuesday, September 13, and bring your response to class on
September 15.
(over for Exercise Two)
Exercise Two:
To complete this assignment, you’ll need to look at actual
physical copies of literary journals. You can do this in the Periodicals Room
of Healey Library or another university library (your Boston Library Consortium
card gives you access to many university libraries in the area). Please plan accordingly.
Go back to the list you compiled for last week’s exercise,
and choose one of the journals you defined as “major” for a literary period,
genre, or discipline that interests you.
Please do not use an interdisciplinary journal.
Locate the journal both in the Periodicals Room and in the
library stacks. Flip through current issues and the bound volumes of back
issues. Go back at least twenty years,
and get a sense for whether and how the journal has evolved by examining issues
from at least three different points in time. Take notes on the developments you
discern, especially in terms of the kinds of articles published by the journal.
1) Type up a quick outline of your findings to share with the class and
with me. You can bring copies of your
outline for the class, or if you email the outline to me by noon on the 20th I
will copy and distribute it to the class.
As you peruse your journal, choose one article of at least
fifteen pages in length. Copy it for yourself and bring the copy with you to
class on September 23rd. If the journal provides abstracts of its articles,
make sure to copy the abstract for the article you have chosen.
2) Read the article carefully, and type up a brief evaluation of the
article. Begin with an accurate bibliographical entry for the article in MLA
style, and a few substantial paragraphs (at least 600 words) that evaluate the
article according to the Reader’s Report Guidelines (on handout and on
blog):
As you evaluate the article, you
night consider:
·
How does the author frame his/her critical task
at the beginning of the article? In other words, what will the author argue,
and what will it contribute to the field?
·
How does the author situate his or her task
within the concerns of the journal’s specific field? What can we learn about
the audience for the journal based on the way in which the author presents his
or her argument
·
Describe the structure of the argument. What forms of argumentation and rhetorical
moves does it deploy? How would you describe the tone of the prose?
Please email your response to me by midnight on Tuesday,
September 20, and bring your response to class on September 22. Please submit one copy of the article and
analysis to me via email, and bring enough copies of your journal outline for
everyone in the class (including me!).
No comments:
Post a Comment